Wagner and Harvey argue that the response format of the WGCTA may account for some of the reliability problems noted above. Evaluation of tools used to measure critical thinking development in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: The number of cases involved in this study was large see Table 2. The latest, the WGCTAs, was revised in and is a short form containing 40 items that can be administered in 45 min. Widener University School of Nursing. In Paper presented at the annual convention of the international reading association. Since the WGCTA is marketed and used as a predictive measure in a wide variety of educational and vocational contexts, and is sometimes used for the academic placement of individuals and for other diagnostic purposes, it would be useful to know if the individual subscales can be interpreted, or whether the general score is the only meaningful outcome.
Nurse behaviors that rescue patients. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 15, 21— Fostering the critical thinking of college women through academic advising and faculty contact. The california critical thinking skills test—college level: Doctoral dissertation, New York University, Want to purchase this test? Further reading These references are studies in the datasets Annis, L.
The Watson-Glaser™ II
An approach to teaching problem solving in the classroom. Since the subscales in different versions contain different numbers of items, Table 4 shows the descriptive data for the WGCTA forms separately.
Strategies for Teaching Students to Think Critically: When subjected to principal components analysis PCAare the five subscales somewhat separate from one another i. Subsequently, we conducted principal components analysis on 60 subscale means of two different versions of the WGCTA.
The 60 studies containing the mean scores of WGCTA subscales came from both the primary study search and the correlational study search. If critical thinking is a general skill or one of highly related skills, approaches to instruction may need to focus more on developing the general qualities of thinking and less on specific sub-skills. Levels of intellectual development and associated critical thinking skills in college students.
What they likely do say is that discriminating among these sub-skills, from a psychometric perspective, is difficult to do. Number of items correct and performance on each scale are reported in addition to an overall percentile and a brief narrative interpretation.
Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA)
Doctoral dissertation, University of Oklahoma, Dissertation Abstracts International Section A: In other words, the true population correlations could be higher or lower than the ones observed. Overall, however, the two analyses are similar in many respects.
Research questions Our first research question relates to the 13 thniking matrices from the literature: Journal of College Student Development, 31 6— Dissertation Abstracts International B, 54 9 Humanities and Social Sciences, 58 7A.
For additional information on these services, click here. If the average inter-correlations among the five subscales drawn for the 13 studies of the WGCTA is reasonably high i. University of Massachusetts Lowell.
The Watson-Glaser™ II | PSI Online
Critical thinking skills of baccalaureate nursing students. As a follow-up to the first question, we also found 60 individual research studies that contained complete descriptive data i. Norms and correlates of the Watson—Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and selected variables for Negro college students.
The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking. Journal of Community Health Nursing, 15, 21— Therefore, in all we collected 70 sets of subscale means subsequently reduced to thinkinf Skip to main content.
A statement of expert consensus for purposes of criticla assessment and instruction, executive summary. While not directly comparable to those of other tests, such as the California critical thinking skills test, they follow from the same theoretical underpinnings.
Educational and Psychological Measurement, 59 6— By publisher policy, this assessment is only to be administered in watson-glaesr proctored setting. The potential implications of this response format with respect to the likelihood of successful guessing are obvious: The application of the structure of intellect programme: Journal of Experimental Education, 38 411— Psychological Reports, 23, — Journal of Instructional Psychology, 25 4—